<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Focus Group Meeting Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imaginechimbo.org/focus-group-meeting-notes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imaginechimbo.org/focus-group-meeting-notes</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:59:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.imaginechimbo.org/focus-group-meeting-notes/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imaginechimbo.org/?p=11#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see things moving ahead on the redesign of the park.  The more attractive it is to use, the safer it will be.  I look forward to seeing the diagrams of possible layouts on line so those who use the park can have input on the eventual outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see things moving ahead on the redesign of the park.  The more attractive it is to use, the safer it will be.  I look forward to seeing the diagrams of possible layouts on line so those who use the park can have input on the eventual outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quentin</title>
		<link>http://www.imaginechimbo.org/focus-group-meeting-notes/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Quentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imaginechimbo.org/?p=11#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Bridgette and Others,

Thanks for your involvement with Chimbo Playground area. I am interested primarily because I am one of the closest neighbors to the area and would also use it more if it was a better area. I left the meeting early so I would like to list a few thoughts here:

-  I think they have captured the amount of sports that should be in the park.

- I am in favor of &quot;green space&quot; in the park. The relative amount shown in BAM&#039;s drawings looks appropriate.

- I am in favor of minimal fencing if we can keep the &quot;bad elements&quot; out another way.

- I am in favor of the basketball courts on the east end of the park. This is the lower end (lower elevation) and noise could be controlled better.

- Based on your notes above, you have 1 tennis court. I would suggest that two courts should be considered because a new/better park would likely bring more tennis players.  BAM should consider a mix-use court (basketball and tennis combination court).

-  Of the BAM drawings, I favor their Option B but would consider moving the entrance from the &quot;Grace St. dead-end corner&quot; to 29th street directly in front of the park (where the park sign is currently located).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bridgette and Others,</p>
<p>Thanks for your involvement with Chimbo Playground area. I am interested primarily because I am one of the closest neighbors to the area and would also use it more if it was a better area. I left the meeting early so I would like to list a few thoughts here:</p>
<p>-  I think they have captured the amount of sports that should be in the park.</p>
<p>- I am in favor of &#8220;green space&#8221; in the park. The relative amount shown in BAM&#8217;s drawings looks appropriate.</p>
<p>- I am in favor of minimal fencing if we can keep the &#8220;bad elements&#8221; out another way.</p>
<p>- I am in favor of the basketball courts on the east end of the park. This is the lower end (lower elevation) and noise could be controlled better.</p>
<p>- Based on your notes above, you have 1 tennis court. I would suggest that two courts should be considered because a new/better park would likely bring more tennis players.  BAM should consider a mix-use court (basketball and tennis combination court).</p>
<p>-  Of the BAM drawings, I favor their Option B but would consider moving the entrance from the &#8220;Grace St. dead-end corner&#8221; to 29th street directly in front of the park (where the park sign is currently located).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church Hill People&#8217;s News &#187; Chimbo playground focus group notes - Richmond, Virginia</title>
		<link>http://www.imaginechimbo.org/focus-group-meeting-notes/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Church Hill People&#8217;s News &#187; Chimbo playground focus group notes - Richmond, Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imaginechimbo.org/?p=11#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] shiny new Friends of Chimborazo Playground site has notes from the focus group meeting last night at St. John&#8217;s to discuss the redesign of Chimborazo Playground. With a budget of $250,000, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shiny new Friends of Chimborazo Playground site has notes from the focus group meeting last night at St. John&#8217;s to discuss the redesign of Chimborazo Playground. With a budget of $250,000, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
